“Fighting people will choose their own weapons. For me, the question of armed struggle versus passive resistance is a tactical one, not an ideological one. For example, how do indigenous people who live deep inside the forest passively resist armed vigilantes and thousands of paramilitary forces who surround their villages at night and burn them to the ground? Passive resistance is political theater. It requires a sympathetic audience. There isn’t one inside the forest. And how do starving people go on a hunger strike?
In certain situations, preaching nonviolence can be a kind of violence. Also, it is the kind of terminology that dovetails beautifully with the “human rights” discourse in which, from an exalted position of faux neutrality, politics, morality, and justice can be airbrushed out of the picture, all parties can be declared human rights offenders, and the status quo can be maintained.”
– Arundhati Roy, via https://bostonreview.net/global-justice/arundhati-roy-thinking-about-empire
Subscribe to DGR updates
- Resistance Profile: Movement for the Emancipation for the Niger Delta (MEND)
- Report says Seattle has highest number of murdered Native American women
- Wasting time on bandaids in an insane system
- Seattle: A City on the Cutting Edge of Empire
- Porn, Trafficking and the Social Construction of Masculinity
Search & filter postsBe careful: if you specify too many criteria you may not find any matching posts!